Scotland Says “No”

So… despite being a very close affair, Scotland has voted against its independence from the UK and the European Union.

Firstly, we should state that we do not believe that the “no” vote was anti-patriotic. Far from it. If anything, it was a vote in favour of maintaining Scottish development. But… given that scotch whisky can only, by its nature (and by law), come from Scotland, we at WU did have to wonder what would have happened if a “yes” vote had prevailed. As such, we kept a keen eye on the build-up to the big decision and how it would have affected the whisky world.

One of the loudest voices to be heard on the matter was that of Diageo. Along with many other establishments, including the Royal Bank of Scotland (!), their concern was the initial impact upon the economy that independence could have. It was widely reported that there was no plan on what currency the nation would operate by, given that they would be divorced from the British pound. Furthermore, there did not appear to be any strategy for how cross-border trading or taxation would operate. Due to such uncertainties, a lot of businesses were facing the very real possibility of having to relocate south of the border in the first instance, so that they could maintain their operations, inevitably taking their employment and profits with them.

Whilst Diageo stated that they were committed to making sure that their distilleries would still run and that they would have done their bit to protect the industry as much as possible (after all, they do own roughly 40% of all scotch whisky production), most economists predicted that the split would have seen an initial hike on all distilleries’ base costs and export charges. The natural consequence of this would have been an inevitable increase in the price of whisky to us willing purchasers. As for the distilleries themselves, particularly those without the big money backing, some frugal decisions would have had to have been made with jobs at stake and even potential closures being faced.

Obviously, Scottish independence could not have simply happened overnight. There are many, many factors and variables that would have needed to have been considered here to successfully separate a country with 300 years of British integration. What cannot be denied about the whole campaign though is the volume of those that voted “yes”, and whilst the impact of independence is somewhat of a moot point for now, the referendum has undoubtedly caught the world’s eye and resulted in greater devolved powers having been promised to Scotland. Today, David Cameron has thanked the Scottish public for choosing to stay within the Union, and what we will hopefully see therefore is a concerted effort within the UK to address and improve the Scottish economy, its businesses and, from a whisky perspective, help maintain and develop the country’s third largest export.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s